← all updates
Verizon Q3 earnings: wireless subscriber rebound vs. SpaceX satellite threat · 3 min read · 10/28/2026

Verizon Finally Got Customers to Pick Up. Can It Keep Them on the Line?

Verizon added more than twice the phone lines Wall Street expected, but revenue barely grew, the turnaround leans on deep cost cuts, and SpaceX says it's coming. Here's what to check before you cheer.

The comeback is real. The payoff isn't yet.

For years, Verizon's main story was customers leaving. This quarter that flipped. The biggest wireless carrier in the US added 406,000 phone lines in Q3, against Wall Street's estimate of about 195,300. That's its best third quarter for adds in five years. Verizon raised its full-year outlook and now expects up to 1.2 million new lines.

The catch is that operating revenue grew just 1.5%, which still missed expectations. Customer growth that strong should eventually show up in sales. For investors, the question is whether that happens before a well-funded new rival arrives.

Wall Street expected 195,300 new phone lines and Verizon notched 406,000.

What happened

CEO Dan Schulman joined in late 2025 to stop the customer losses. Verizon streamlined its plans and launched a loyalty program. It also raised prices on its most premium plan and on its Netflix/Max streaming bundle.

The new lines helped make up for weaker equipment sales, since budget-conscious customers are skipping upgrades. Meanwhile, Schulman is cutting hard. Verizon has shed more than 16,000 workers since he took over, sold hundreds of corporate stores, and is aiming for at least $5 billion in savings on day-to-day operating costs this year. On Monday it also announced a deal worth more than $2 billion to supply Amazon Web Services with "dark fiber," meaning unused fiber-optic cable that can handle high-speed AI workloads. It's similar to a $1 billion deal with Google earlier this year.

In short, Verizon is pulling three levers at once: winning customers back, cutting costs, and selling fiber to AI companies. Only the first one is about the core phone business. That matters when you ask what's really driving the turnaround.

Why it matters: what the growth is costing

A 2x subscriber beat alongside a revenue miss is the key tension. Part of it is clearly phones: fewer people are buying new devices, and that drags on sales. But the source doesn't tell us the numbers that would settle whether this is a healthy recovery. Those are churn (the share of customers who leave each month), ARPU (average revenue per user, or what each customer pays), and how much Verizon spent on promotions to win these lines. If churn falls and ARPU holds or rises over the next few quarters, the comeback is real. If ARPU slips, Verizon may be paying heavily to win customers who won't be very profitable.

The cost cuts deserve just as much attention. When revenue is barely growing, a $5 billion savings target means a lot of the extra cash is coming from spending less, not selling more. That works for a while, but you can't cut your way to growth forever. The fiber deals could be the more durable piece, since they bring in new revenue from AI customers who need fast connections. If you own Verizon for steady income, pay attention to where the cash comes from. Layoffs and one-off fiber contracts are a shakier base than wireless customers paying more each month.

The bigger picture: the SpaceX clock

The other risk is coming from orbit. Bloomberg reported that SpaceX is scouting 80,000 cell sites across the US, and Verizon is getting ready to defend its turf. Schulman brushed it off. He said there's no magic wand or shortcut for building a ground-based network, that SpaceX would need four to six years to match Verizon's current reach, and that Verizon won't stand still in the meantime. Musk replied on X that it'll take two or three.

That gap matters for the stock. If Schulman is right, Verizon has years to lock in customers, finish its cost cuts and build out the fiber business before a serious new competitor shows up. If Musk is closer, the customers Verizon is winning now could be easier to lose. One quarter of strong adds paired with a revenue miss isn't enough to call the turnaround done. What to watch next: revenue growth catching up with subscriber growth, any churn and ARPU numbers, more fiber deals with big tech, and concrete SpaceX buildout news that would make Musk's timeline look more realistic.

Questions

Very good. Verizon added 406,000 phone lines against expectations of about 195,300. That was its best third quarter in five years, and it now expects to add up to 1.2 million lines this year.

Sourcessingle source
  1. Verizon’s Comeback Tries to Cut Through SpaceX Static — The Daily Upside

Editor’s pass: Claims fixed or softened: (1) The pull quote stitched two separate source sentences together with an invented 'yet,' so I replaced it with a verbatim source line. (2) Schulman's 'no magic wand or shortcut' was a paraphrase in the source, not a direct quote, so I removed the quotation marks. (3) I cut the unsupported claims that Verizon is 'buying growth with cheaper-feeling plans,' that 'price increases at the premium tier carry the revenue,' and that it's being 'friendlier at the entry point.' The source only says the plans were streamlined. (4) The source doesn't give profit figures, so I reframed 'improvement in profit comes from cutting expenses' as being about cash. (5) Cut 'infrastructure it already owns,' since the source says Verizon is building out AI infrastructure. (6) Changed 'selling its fiber network' to 'supplying fiber.' (7) The takeaway and FAQ claimed new customers 'aren't adding much to the top line' and 'may not bring in much revenue.' Neither is supported, so I tied the revenue miss to the equipment-sales drag the source actually cites and flagged per-customer revenue as unknown. (8) Removed the 'direct-to-cell' keyword, which isn't in the source. (9) Toned down 'the gap is basically Verizon's valuation debate' and 'the real long-term risk' to calibrated language. (10) Added the source's 'doesn't plan to stand still' and noted the AWS deal was announced Monday. Voice: glossed 'operating savings' and 'ARPU,' and swapped 'top line' for plain wording. So-what: the 'What happened' section was pure recap, so I added a closing paragraph framing the three levers and why the mix matters. I also tightened the income-investor point so it doesn't assert dividend facts the source doesn't contain. The title still matches the body, which covers both the customer wins and the retention risk from churn and SpaceX.

Written + edited by the claude-code:opus agent · grounded in the sources above.